Re: 南京大虐殺・従軍慰安婦強制連行の嘘
投稿者： ooo_ooo_ooo 投稿日時： 2006/05/12 22:00 投稿番号： [9647 / 41162]
この人の意見は､中共が10億の人間をまとめるのに利用している点にも及んでいます｡この本が読まれると､南京の展示館を見る海外の眼も変わるでしょうね｡ちょうど､オリンピックも開かれるときでもありますし｡写真が皆ニセという訳ですから｡
自然と浸透すると思います｡
＞There are two issues that lie with this book and extend to other books like this (e.g. "What Really Happened in Nanking," by Masaaki Tanaka). First, historians should consider placing the Sino-Japanese conflict in the contexts of both early 20th century imperialism and the threat of Communism. The battle for Nanking was a fragment of the larger struggle between East and West, or, Asians vs. Whites. The "revisionist historians" may want to consider place Nanking within the context of the larger racial struggle. There maybe English language books that previously discussed this theme, but have not found their way into the mainstream, since Japan is still today portrayed as the aggressor in American history classrooms, films and TV programs. There will be those who argue that Japan had no right in interfering with a sovereign country, but a glance at a world map of the 1930's will demonstrate how hollow and hypocritical the argument is. The same people that argue against Japanese imperialism will probably argue in favor of U.S. imperialism in the Middle East. If placed in the proper context, perceptive Americans will be able to better appreciate Japan's pre-war situation.
The second issue that needs to be fully developed in English language books that refute the "Nanking massacre" is understanding the motivation of Asians, particularly the Communist Chinese, of why they persist in bringing up this issue year after year, despite the factual weakness of the allegations. Perhaps the Chinese see "Nanking massacre" as a domestic cudgel, in that the Communists have no real way of uniting over 1 billion people other than by the use of repression or channeling the people's attention on an external enemy, ala "1984". As some minority groups have done in the past in Europe, the Chinese may also be using "Nanking" as a moral-economic weapon, evoking guilt to extract reparations, economic aid and other "donations". Understanding why the Chinese keep the war-time myths alive would help to deflate their usefulness as weapons. Perceptive Americans will think about other situations where guilt underlies policy - and hopefully act to change them.
自然と浸透すると思います｡
＞There are two issues that lie with this book and extend to other books like this (e.g. "What Really Happened in Nanking," by Masaaki Tanaka). First, historians should consider placing the Sino-Japanese conflict in the contexts of both early 20th century imperialism and the threat of Communism. The battle for Nanking was a fragment of the larger struggle between East and West, or, Asians vs. Whites. The "revisionist historians" may want to consider place Nanking within the context of the larger racial struggle. There maybe English language books that previously discussed this theme, but have not found their way into the mainstream, since Japan is still today portrayed as the aggressor in American history classrooms, films and TV programs. There will be those who argue that Japan had no right in interfering with a sovereign country, but a glance at a world map of the 1930's will demonstrate how hollow and hypocritical the argument is. The same people that argue against Japanese imperialism will probably argue in favor of U.S. imperialism in the Middle East. If placed in the proper context, perceptive Americans will be able to better appreciate Japan's pre-war situation.
The second issue that needs to be fully developed in English language books that refute the "Nanking massacre" is understanding the motivation of Asians, particularly the Communist Chinese, of why they persist in bringing up this issue year after year, despite the factual weakness of the allegations. Perhaps the Chinese see "Nanking massacre" as a domestic cudgel, in that the Communists have no real way of uniting over 1 billion people other than by the use of repression or channeling the people's attention on an external enemy, ala "1984". As some minority groups have done in the past in Europe, the Chinese may also be using "Nanking" as a moral-economic weapon, evoking guilt to extract reparations, economic aid and other "donations". Understanding why the Chinese keep the war-time myths alive would help to deflate their usefulness as weapons. Perceptive Americans will think about other situations where guilt underlies policy - and hopefully act to change them.
これは メッセージ 9643 (monkeybrain132 さん)への返信です．