対イラク武力行使

2. A PRINCIPLE OF INT'L TREATY IS BINDING

＞エトランゼさん自らが認めているとおり、拘束力があるのは規則であって原則ではない。原則というものは規則の前提であるから、例外がつきもの。

Noting my first point that all wordings in an int'l treay is binding to all state parties with exception of reservations declared by the state party, the principle of an int'l treaty is also BINDING and is the fundamental, non-negotiable points that underscore each of the statues in a treaty. And I DID NOT admit, in contrary to your misperception, that principle is non-binding.

＞原則そのものに拘束力はない。こういう書類を書くにあたっては専門の弁護士が何人も頭をつき合わせてかいているわけで、わざわざ規則といわず、原則と書いたことに注意を払うべきである。エトランゼさんは原則と規則を混合していおり、この解釈は正しくない。

You really ought to get a quick run on IR101, Mrs. Kakashi. In treaties, RULES（規則） are only used for terms such as "rules & procedures" which oftentimes is a supplementary text that accompany the main treaty. The treaty itself is a STATUTE (also“規則”in general but in legal terms, “規程”）which stipulates the legally binding terms for the state parties.

(INCOMPLETE)