Re: “非難”決議と“勧告”決議を一緒にす
投稿者： legal_guardian01 投稿日時： 2011/02/20 20:30 投稿番号： [52224 / 62227]
＞たとえば「シーシェパードの旗国になるな！寄港させるな！」“勧告”決議ならそりゃ四カ国は決議無視ってことになるが単なる“非難”決議程度で旗国拒否、寄港拒否なんてできやしねえんだよアホ。
ｒちゃん、何が非難されているか分かってないね。ほら
This item was included on the agenda at the request of Japan in view of protest activities of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society that despite the adoption by consensus of IWC Resolutions at the 2006 and 2007 Annual Meetings11 had again been launched against JARPA II research activities in the Southern Ocean during the austral summer of 2007/2008. Japan described the nature of the action taken which it believed had posed a serious threat to the safety of its vessels and their crew. It referred to the statement that had been issued in March by the Intersessional Meeting of the Commission on the Future of IWC, in which the meeting inter alia: (1) reiterated that the Commission and its Contracting Governments do not condone and in fact condemn any actions that are a risk to human life and property in relation to the activities of vessels at sea; and (2) urged Contracting Governments to ‘take actions, in accordance with relevant rules of international law and respective national laws and regulations, to co-operate to prevent and suppress actions that risk human life and property at sea and with respect to alleged offenders’. Japan welcomed the consultations and co-operation it has had with other relevant governments and the concrete results that are being achieved. It hoped that IWC would encourage future co-operation.
日本の調査捕鯨に対する妨害行為だよ。(2)にtake actionsとあるだろう。妨害行為を停止させるように「措置をとれ」という意味だ。urgeには強要のニュアンスがあるんだよ。
これにエコテロリスト支援四カ国は賛同したんだよ。ｒ君の屁理屈なんざ通用しない。
＞最近のlegal_guardian01（ID共有）はかなり精神年齢の低いウヨガキでしたとさ。
典型的な人身攻撃だな。教科書通りだ。反論できなくなった輩が良く使うんだ。ここでも↓読んで勉強することだ。
＞人身攻撃（ラテン語: ad hominem、argumentum ad hominem）とは、ある論証や事実の主張に対する応答として、その主張自体に具体的に反論するのではなく、それを主張した人の個性や信念を攻撃すること。論点をすりかえる作用をもたらす。
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/人身攻撃
ｒちゃん、何が非難されているか分かってないね。ほら
This item was included on the agenda at the request of Japan in view of protest activities of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society that despite the adoption by consensus of IWC Resolutions at the 2006 and 2007 Annual Meetings11 had again been launched against JARPA II research activities in the Southern Ocean during the austral summer of 2007/2008. Japan described the nature of the action taken which it believed had posed a serious threat to the safety of its vessels and their crew. It referred to the statement that had been issued in March by the Intersessional Meeting of the Commission on the Future of IWC, in which the meeting inter alia: (1) reiterated that the Commission and its Contracting Governments do not condone and in fact condemn any actions that are a risk to human life and property in relation to the activities of vessels at sea; and (2) urged Contracting Governments to ‘take actions, in accordance with relevant rules of international law and respective national laws and regulations, to co-operate to prevent and suppress actions that risk human life and property at sea and with respect to alleged offenders’. Japan welcomed the consultations and co-operation it has had with other relevant governments and the concrete results that are being achieved. It hoped that IWC would encourage future co-operation.
日本の調査捕鯨に対する妨害行為だよ。(2)にtake actionsとあるだろう。妨害行為を停止させるように「措置をとれ」という意味だ。urgeには強要のニュアンスがあるんだよ。
これにエコテロリスト支援四カ国は賛同したんだよ。ｒ君の屁理屈なんざ通用しない。
＞最近のlegal_guardian01（ID共有）はかなり精神年齢の低いウヨガキでしたとさ。
典型的な人身攻撃だな。教科書通りだ。反論できなくなった輩が良く使うんだ。ここでも↓読んで勉強することだ。
＞人身攻撃（ラテン語: ad hominem、argumentum ad hominem）とは、ある論証や事実の主張に対する応答として、その主張自体に具体的に反論するのではなく、それを主張した人の個性や信念を攻撃すること。論点をすりかえる作用をもたらす。
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/人身攻撃
これは メッセージ 52214 (r13812 さん)への返信です．
固定リンク：https://yarchive.emmanuelc.dix.asia/1834578/a45a4a2a1aabdt7afa1aaja7dfldbja4c0a1aa_1/52224.html