イスラエル／パレスチナ和平

＞1947年11月の国連パレスチナ分割決議案に関して、
＞「ユダヤ側は受諾したが、アラブ側は拒否した。このため第一次パレスチナ戦争が勃発、パレスチナ難民が発生した」
という俗説は、イスラエルのプロパガンダであり、歴史的事実ではありません。


▲横ヤリで失礼、アドベンさん。

相変わらずこーゆー人がいるんですね。

国連の議事録も読みもせずにカキコする人が多くて（わら


▲「without the intervention either of the United Nations or of any other party ...」を誰だかさんみたいに忘れないでね♪



◇III. THE AD HOC COMMITTEE ON PALESTINE
http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/561c6ee353d740fb8525607d00581829/d442111e70e417e3802564740045a309!OpenDoc ument

When the second session of the United Nations General Assembly convened in September 1947 it constituted itself as an Ad Hoc Committee to deal with the Palestine question while considering in its normal session the other items on its agenda.

....

At the end of the general discussion the Chairman proposed the appointment of two sub-committees to report on the two proposals before the Ad Hoc Committee and a third sub-committee to try to promote conciliation between the Arab and Zionist positions, the last sub-committee to be informal. The Syrian representative proposed another sub-committee:

The Chairman discouraged this proposal as it would prolong the Committee's work, and the composition of the two sub-committees was decided as follows:

Sub-Committee No. 1: Canada, Czechoslovakia, Guatemala, Poland, South Africa, USSR, United States, Hungary, Venezuela.

Sub-Committee No. 2: Afghanistan, Colombia, Iraq, Lebanon, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Yemen.

The two Sub-Committees met for four weeks in late 1947. Sub-Committee 1, after intensive discussions over the date of independence and the form and extent of United Nations control during transition, made the following significant changes in the Special Committee's majority plan in order to conform to certain decisions insisted upon by Great Britain:

The reports of the two Sub-Committees were presented to the Ad Hoc Committee on 24 November 1947 in a highly charged atmosphere. The report of Sub-Committee 2 (voted on before the report of Sub-Committee 1) detailed the arguments for a unified Palestine, addressing the legal question of the competence of the United Nations to partition the country:

"To sum up, the dissolution of the League of Nations, and the consequent removal of the legal basis for the Mandate, and the more recent declarations by the Mandatory of its intention to withdraw from Palestine, open the way for the establishment of an independent government in Palestine by the people of the country, without the intervention either of the United Nations or of any other party ...

"Moreover, partition involves the alienation of territory and the destruction of the integrity of the State of Palestine. The United Nations cannot make a disposition or alienation of territory, nor can it deprive the majority of the people of Palestine of their territory and transfer it to the exclusive use of a minority in the country ..."

The report's first resolution, questioning the legal power of the General Assembly to partition Palestine was rejected. ...


The report of Sub-Committee 1, in substance the amended Special Committee's majority recommendations for the partition of Palestine, was then voted upon on 25 November 1947. The vote was 25 votes to 13 with 17 abstentions.* Since a two-thirds majority was not required in the Assembly sitting as Ad Hoc Committee, the proposal to partition Palestine was approved and recommended to the General Assembly.