こりゃまた。
投稿者: henchin_pokoider01 投稿日時: 2004/10/31 00:37 投稿番号: [6014 / 18519]
>『Dissenting opinion of Judge Franck(フランク裁判官の反対意見)』に範囲を縮小してやったのだが、
フランクが何に反対してるか理解できてないようだ。あはは〜。それとて、1人の反対意見だけどなpu。
132.As early as 1914,Great Britain took steps to regulate and control the collection of turtle eggs on Ligitan and Sipadan.Malaysia stresses the fact that it was to British North Borneo officials that the resolution of disputes
concerning the collection of turtle eggs was referred. It notes that a licensing system was established for boats used to fish the waters around the islands. Malaysia also relies on the establishment in 1933 of a bird sanctuary on Sipadan. Malaysia further points out that the British North Borneo colonial authorities constructed lighthouses on Ligitan and Sipadan Islands in the early 1960s and that these exist to this day and are maintained by the Malaysian authorities.
136.The Court finally observes that it can only consider those acts as constituting a relevant display of authority which leave no doubt as to their specific reference to the islands in dispute as such. Regulations or administrative acts of a general nature can therefore be taken as effectivites with regard to Ligitan and Sipadan only if it is clear from their terms or their effects that they pertained to these two islands.
フランクが何に反対してるか理解できてないようだ。あはは〜。それとて、1人の反対意見だけどなpu。
132.As early as 1914,Great Britain took steps to regulate and control the collection of turtle eggs on Ligitan and Sipadan.Malaysia stresses the fact that it was to British North Borneo officials that the resolution of disputes
concerning the collection of turtle eggs was referred. It notes that a licensing system was established for boats used to fish the waters around the islands. Malaysia also relies on the establishment in 1933 of a bird sanctuary on Sipadan. Malaysia further points out that the British North Borneo colonial authorities constructed lighthouses on Ligitan and Sipadan Islands in the early 1960s and that these exist to this day and are maintained by the Malaysian authorities.
136.The Court finally observes that it can only consider those acts as constituting a relevant display of authority which leave no doubt as to their specific reference to the islands in dispute as such. Regulations or administrative acts of a general nature can therefore be taken as effectivites with regard to Ligitan and Sipadan only if it is clear from their terms or their effects that they pertained to these two islands.
これは メッセージ 6013 (T_Ohtaguro さん)への返信です.
固定リンク:https://yarchive.emmanuelc.dix.asia/1835396/cddeg_1/6014.html