竹島

>国際法を論ずるのならば、この問題に関しては二国間関係が重要になる。
-------------------------- -
またしても判例さえ提示できないurinara国際法の披露でんな。

>ＩＣＪに於いても近代国際法が普及する以前の１３世紀に遡って審理が行われたこともあるのだよ。つまりは、歴史的権原こそが重要なのだ。
-------------------------- -
ああ各国が、我田引水の史料解釈をした強弁をするので審理はする。問題はそれが実効的支配と認められたか否かなんだよね。今回は恥をかかないように「ネタ」の信憑性は確認したのか？
<MINQUIERS AND ECREHOS CASE>
There are, however, other ancient documents which provide some indications as to the possession of the islets in dispute. The United Kingdom relied on them to show that the Channel Islands were considered as an entity and, since the more important islands were held by England, this country also possessed the groups in dispute. For the Court, there appears to be a strong presumption in favour of this view, without it being possible however, to draw any definitive conclusion as to the sovereignty over the groups, since this question must ultimately depend on the evidence which relates directly to possession.
＜中略＞
イギリスの実効支配の証拠の判断
From the beginning of the nineteenth century, the connection became closer again, because of the growing importance of oyster fishery. The Court attached probative value to various acts relating to the exercise by Jersey of jurisdiction and local administration and to legislation, such as criminal proceedings concerning the Ecrehos, the levying of taxes on habitable houses or huts built in the islets since 1889, the registration in Jersey of contracts dealing with real estate on the Ecrehos.
＜中略＞
フランスの実効支配の証拠の判断
The Court did not find that the facts invoked by the French Government were sufficient to show that France has a valid title to the Minquiers. As to the above-mentioned facts from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in particular, such acts could hardly be considered as sufficient evidence of the intention of that Government to act as sovereign over the islets. Nor were those acts of such a character that they could be considered as involving a manifestation of State authority in respect of the islets.

結論
In such circumstances, and having regard to the view expressed above with regard to the evidence produced by the United Kingdom Government, the Court was of opinion that the sovereignty over the Minquiers belongs to the United Kingdom.