バカJ、これに参加するか?
投稿者: shinkuuboakagi 投稿日時: 2001/08/10 05:02 投稿番号: [10269 / 35788]
おまえの学力では派無理かな。(教育・全般・「なぜ右翼はていのうなのか」とかいうカテ)
さて、低学力・左翼、テストだ
投稿者: shinkuuboakagi (555歳/太平洋) 2001年8月10日 午前 4時10分
メッセージ: 71 / 71
以下の英文和訳の試験に通らない左翼は以後レスを禁じる。自信のある者のみ答えよ。まず零点だと言うことは予測しておく。回答がない場合はここで左翼を罵りつづける。
>想像の共同体
投稿者: shinkuuboakagi (555歳/太平洋) 2001年7月30日 午前 2時49分
メッセージ: 245 / 376
愛国心についてのこんな文書も書いておこう。
Patriotism, however much it may be debased, is still patriotism; and although it might be exaggeration to contend that the more debased patriotism becomes, the more patriotic it is reputed to be, it is on the other hand certainly true that a pure and rational patriotism is generally condemned as a kind of treason. As usual, irreconcilable meanings lurk behind the convenient word. Many of the feelings sanctified by it are wholly brutish, and one can think of many modern instances of Dr. Johnson's famous saying that patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. But apart from these contemptible hypocrisies there is plenty of sincere and honest patriotism which, though tunred to base uses, is potentially an inexhaustible source of strength to the general good of the country and the world.
これはやさしすぎるから訳さなくていい。訳すのは以下。
Once again I warn you against supposing, you who may specially love art, that you will do any good by attempting to revive art by dealing with its dead exterior. I say it is the AIM Of ART that you must seek rather than the AIM
ITSELF; and in that search we may find ourselves in a world blank and bare, as a result of our caring at least this much for art, that we will not endure the shams of it.
出題者の温情。それぞれのthatの意味と働きに注意せよ。(出典はH.リードの「芸術と産業」の序文のウイリアムス・モリスの文)
これに合格点を取れた左翼がいたらみなおす。本気で誉めてやる。(五人の東大生にテストしたが、合格点はひとりもいない。最初の文は私のところに来ている高校生でも訳せた)。
さて、低学力・左翼、テストだ
投稿者: shinkuuboakagi (555歳/太平洋) 2001年8月10日 午前 4時10分
メッセージ: 71 / 71
以下の英文和訳の試験に通らない左翼は以後レスを禁じる。自信のある者のみ答えよ。まず零点だと言うことは予測しておく。回答がない場合はここで左翼を罵りつづける。
>想像の共同体
投稿者: shinkuuboakagi (555歳/太平洋) 2001年7月30日 午前 2時49分
メッセージ: 245 / 376
愛国心についてのこんな文書も書いておこう。
Patriotism, however much it may be debased, is still patriotism; and although it might be exaggeration to contend that the more debased patriotism becomes, the more patriotic it is reputed to be, it is on the other hand certainly true that a pure and rational patriotism is generally condemned as a kind of treason. As usual, irreconcilable meanings lurk behind the convenient word. Many of the feelings sanctified by it are wholly brutish, and one can think of many modern instances of Dr. Johnson's famous saying that patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel. But apart from these contemptible hypocrisies there is plenty of sincere and honest patriotism which, though tunred to base uses, is potentially an inexhaustible source of strength to the general good of the country and the world.
これはやさしすぎるから訳さなくていい。訳すのは以下。
Once again I warn you against supposing, you who may specially love art, that you will do any good by attempting to revive art by dealing with its dead exterior. I say it is the AIM Of ART that you must seek rather than the AIM
ITSELF; and in that search we may find ourselves in a world blank and bare, as a result of our caring at least this much for art, that we will not endure the shams of it.
出題者の温情。それぞれのthatの意味と働きに注意せよ。(出典はH.リードの「芸術と産業」の序文のウイリアムス・モリスの文)
これに合格点を取れた左翼がいたらみなおす。本気で誉めてやる。(五人の東大生にテストしたが、合格点はひとりもいない。最初の文は私のところに来ている高校生でも訳せた)。
これは メッセージ 1 (kim20OO さん)への返信です.