自称文明人〔実はシオニスト〕曰く
投稿者： romjisuman 投稿日時： 2006/09/15 18:30 投稿番号： [448 / 2525]
>ただそのために無実の人間を大量に殺すことが許されるというところで我々文明人はひっかかるわけですけどね。
ひっかかるそうです （ｗ
http://www.agrnews.org/issues/147/
アフガニスタン国際戦犯民衆法廷
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%A2%E3%83%95%E3%82%AC%E3%83%8B%E3%82%B9%E3%82%BF%E3%83%B3%E5%9B%BD%E9%9A%9B%E6%88%A6%E7%8A%AF%E6%B0%91%E8%A1%86%E6%B3%95%E5%BB%B7
According to Marc W. Herold's Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing at least 3700 and probably closer to 5000 civilians were killed as a result of U.S. bombing[17]. Herold's study omitted those killed indirectly, when air strikes cut off their access to hospitals, food or electricity. Also exempt were bomb victims who later died of their injuries. When there were different casualty figures from the same incident, in 90% of cases Professor Herold chose a lower figure.
Some people, however, dispute Herold's estimates. Joshua Muravchik of the American Enterprise Institute and Carl Conetta of the Project on Defense Alternatives question Herold's heavy use of the Afghan Islamic Press (the Taliban's official mouthpiece) and claim tallies provided them were suspicious. Conetta also claims statistical errors in Herold's study[18] [19]. Conetta's study puts total civilian casualties between 1,000 and 1,300 [20]. A Los Angeles Times study put the number of collateral dead between 1,067 and 1,201.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_war_in_Afghanistan
３０，０００
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJnm-GmlbIk&mode=related&search=
ひっかかるそうです （ｗ
http://www.agrnews.org/issues/147/
アフガニスタン国際戦犯民衆法廷
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%A2%E3%83%95%E3%82%AC%E3%83%8B%E3%82%B9%E3%82%BF%E3%83%B3%E5%9B%BD%E9%9A%9B%E6%88%A6%E7%8A%AF%E6%B0%91%E8%A1%86%E6%B3%95%E5%BB%B7
According to Marc W. Herold's Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing at least 3700 and probably closer to 5000 civilians were killed as a result of U.S. bombing[17]. Herold's study omitted those killed indirectly, when air strikes cut off their access to hospitals, food or electricity. Also exempt were bomb victims who later died of their injuries. When there were different casualty figures from the same incident, in 90% of cases Professor Herold chose a lower figure.
Some people, however, dispute Herold's estimates. Joshua Muravchik of the American Enterprise Institute and Carl Conetta of the Project on Defense Alternatives question Herold's heavy use of the Afghan Islamic Press (the Taliban's official mouthpiece) and claim tallies provided them were suspicious. Conetta also claims statistical errors in Herold's study[18] [19]. Conetta's study puts total civilian casualties between 1,000 and 1,300 [20]. A Los Angeles Times study put the number of collateral dead between 1,067 and 1,201.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_war_in_Afghanistan
３０，０００
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJnm-GmlbIk&mode=related&search=
これは メッセージ 447 (oxnardnokakashi さん)への返信です．
固定リンク：https://yarchive.emmanuelc.dix.asia/1834682/4hda5a4la5qa5la59a5aa5ja1aaa1jbha32hga1k_1/448.html