Re: 水産庁の情報操作/日本の信用
投稿者: legal_guardian01 投稿日時: 2009/09/21 09:48 投稿番号: [38129 / 62227]
>でも『Nature』の「Journal of Cetacean Research and Management」は“査読付き”、残念だったな。
落ち着け。何書いているのかさっぱり分からないぞ。NatureとJournal of Cetacean Research and Managementは別の雑誌だろうに。
>Commentary articles focus on policy, science and society or purely scientific issues related to physics. Single-author articles are preferred as this is an ‘opinion’ section of the journal. Commentaries are usually commissioned by the editors, but proposals are welcome. They should be of immediate interest to a broad readership and should be written in an accessible, non-technical style. Figures and diagrams are encouraged, but are not a requirement. Commentaries are typically no longer than 1,500 words and include up to 25 references. Article titles are omitted from the reference list.
Commentaryは論文じゃない。査読もへったくれもない。
これは メッセージ 38127 (r13812 さん)への返信です.
固定リンク:https://yarchive.emmanuelc.dix.asia/1834578/a45a4a2a1aabdt7afa1aaja7dfldbja4c0a1aa_1/38129.html