南京大虐殺・従軍慰安婦強制連行の嘘

＞そういえば貴方の言動は親ユダヤ民主党員（言うまでも無くアメリカの民主党です）に似てますね。私の「印象」だけどｗ

目が節穴というか、こちらがうまくだましおおせたというか。

David KennedyやEzra Vogelが、南京市民虐殺はなかったとか、シナ大陸で日本軍の侵略暴虐はなかったといってるわけ？

こんなのがあった。

Historians have accepted the broad thrust of Chang's work: there were indeed
marauding gangs of Japanese soldiers who picked civilians at random,
assaulting them, torturing them, decapitating them, bayoneting them, burning
them, and inventing unimaginably cruel ways to humiliate them. Some were
hung by their tongues, Chang revealed, others dismembered.

But some critics believe she overstated her case, by insisting that Nanking
be treated on par with the Holocaust. Historian David Kennedy of Stanford
University in California wrote:

"Accusation and outrage, rather than analysis and understanding, are
[Chang's] dominant motifs, and although outrage is a morally necessary
response to Nanjing, it is an intellectually insufficient one. Chang does a
much better job of describing the horrors of Nanjing than of explaining
them."

Maybe. But Chang remained faithful to a larger truth. Facts can only go so
far, a historian's job is to interpret. Emotions and anecdotes don't hinder
understanding, and dispassionate and unbiased accounts reconstructed in the
passive voice lead to a passive history made up of dots, without
the connections.
http://www.saliltripathi.com/articles/changsgreatcontribution.htm