翻訳してみろマークよう( ´ー`)y-
投稿者: qapla_jup 投稿日時: 2009/08/06 20:54 投稿番号: [153434 / 230347]
The Japanese armaments hold minimum self-defense for the menace
from the outside for a purpose not sake to invade other countries.
Therefore, it is totally impossible to seem to invade unrelated
other countries as a war-hound of the United States Armed Forces
in Vietnam War like South Korea. Your re“mark” is completely made
in a wrong premise. What in the world, you think, where does Japan
assume that do war with? North Korea?In geopolitical view,
is it a story after South Korea fell in less than a week…LOL?
Even though South Korean force is no matter how weak (just like you,
Mark, yo, shit we“a”k), will it hold until running out of the ammunition of
poor NK forces?
In the days of the Cold War, Japan functioned as a member of
western alliance, as a strategic point of the Far East area to suppress
the expansion of the Communism Camp. It contributed to not only
the profit of the own country, but also at the same time, the
stability of
neighboring developing countries. Particularly for South Korea,
Japan played a role as the rear base of the Korean War, and after
the truce began, have been a keystone of deterrent as the
observatory base and the war potential accumulation place, against
NK forces and the Eastern support powers aiming to southing.
For example, the Korean Peninsula would be reunified under NK system
long ago like a Vietnamese case, and if there was not rear base
blocked by a natural barrier called the sea, and it was only
a bridgehead called South Vietnam.
The chicken race of the expansion of armaments by the U.S. and
the Soviet Union ended in victory of the former, but it was the
great waste that it bet the prestige of the country on. It was
glorious, and idiotical race. The participating countries of it,
was U.S.A, and the communist country, which did not pay interest to
the happiness of the nation.
In late years a burden of maintenance / the update of the weapon
bends over U.S.A. which is the only winner. In the military
(and economic) affairs side, U.S.A is already the dinosaur,
which evolved to an extremity.
It’s still in age of Pax Romana? Does the Spanish Armada dominate
the Seven Seas?? Hegemony is sure to shift someday in the future.
It’s a historical fact.
Therefore, each country must have military defense power, capacity
in the reasonable range that it thinks about. “Every man, woman and
child lives under a Nuclear Sword of Damocles”(hey, do you know
the source of quotation?), it’s logical to restrict for removing
offensive ability of the hostility power, unless it plans invasion
to other countries.
The possibility that long-term all-out war breaks out of
the World War 3 scale is already low. Because a large country
cannot but scatter war potential because of the scale, in addition,
a supply division and an economic risk are too big.
In addition, do you remember? You said in No.147021,
“Japan and South Korea is the military alliance partner”.
However (LOL), it isn’t true. If what you say is right, by
the difference of the power of nations, South Korean Forces
will be forgiven existence only as the “suicide attack corps”
for USA and Japanese interest. During the Cold War, it was
just the role that South Korean Forces was allotted, wasn’t so?
Was it removed?
Eureka! It’s the reason that Korean Aegis vessel has such a heavy
armament!
Are you satisfied with such a conclusion? How do you think?
If you want to call this comment is borrowed plumes, you must find
all sources of this. I don’t stop your looking for them, but
you can’t discover them eternally. Want to try?
Well, let’s translate this, and raise objection in English! I wait
expectantly for your reply.
Fightin’(LOL)!
from the outside for a purpose not sake to invade other countries.
Therefore, it is totally impossible to seem to invade unrelated
other countries as a war-hound of the United States Armed Forces
in Vietnam War like South Korea. Your re“mark” is completely made
in a wrong premise. What in the world, you think, where does Japan
assume that do war with? North Korea?In geopolitical view,
is it a story after South Korea fell in less than a week…LOL?
Even though South Korean force is no matter how weak (just like you,
Mark, yo, shit we“a”k), will it hold until running out of the ammunition of
poor NK forces?
In the days of the Cold War, Japan functioned as a member of
western alliance, as a strategic point of the Far East area to suppress
the expansion of the Communism Camp. It contributed to not only
the profit of the own country, but also at the same time, the
stability of
neighboring developing countries. Particularly for South Korea,
Japan played a role as the rear base of the Korean War, and after
the truce began, have been a keystone of deterrent as the
observatory base and the war potential accumulation place, against
NK forces and the Eastern support powers aiming to southing.
For example, the Korean Peninsula would be reunified under NK system
long ago like a Vietnamese case, and if there was not rear base
blocked by a natural barrier called the sea, and it was only
a bridgehead called South Vietnam.
The chicken race of the expansion of armaments by the U.S. and
the Soviet Union ended in victory of the former, but it was the
great waste that it bet the prestige of the country on. It was
glorious, and idiotical race. The participating countries of it,
was U.S.A, and the communist country, which did not pay interest to
the happiness of the nation.
In late years a burden of maintenance / the update of the weapon
bends over U.S.A. which is the only winner. In the military
(and economic) affairs side, U.S.A is already the dinosaur,
which evolved to an extremity.
It’s still in age of Pax Romana? Does the Spanish Armada dominate
the Seven Seas?? Hegemony is sure to shift someday in the future.
It’s a historical fact.
Therefore, each country must have military defense power, capacity
in the reasonable range that it thinks about. “Every man, woman and
child lives under a Nuclear Sword of Damocles”(hey, do you know
the source of quotation?), it’s logical to restrict for removing
offensive ability of the hostility power, unless it plans invasion
to other countries.
The possibility that long-term all-out war breaks out of
the World War 3 scale is already low. Because a large country
cannot but scatter war potential because of the scale, in addition,
a supply division and an economic risk are too big.
In addition, do you remember? You said in No.147021,
“Japan and South Korea is the military alliance partner”.
However (LOL), it isn’t true. If what you say is right, by
the difference of the power of nations, South Korean Forces
will be forgiven existence only as the “suicide attack corps”
for USA and Japanese interest. During the Cold War, it was
just the role that South Korean Forces was allotted, wasn’t so?
Was it removed?
Eureka! It’s the reason that Korean Aegis vessel has such a heavy
armament!
Are you satisfied with such a conclusion? How do you think?
If you want to call this comment is borrowed plumes, you must find
all sources of this. I don’t stop your looking for them, but
you can’t discover them eternally. Want to try?
Well, let’s translate this, and raise objection in English! I wait
expectantly for your reply.
Fightin’(LOL)!
これは メッセージ 153387 (qapla_jup さん)への返信です.
固定リンク:https://yarchive.emmanuelc.dix.asia/1143582/ffckdca4h4z9qa4n5doc0a4n9adbel_1/153434.html