日本と韓国の議論の広場

え〜、てな訳で、今更ですがマーク君の過去レス№141886をあげつらい
ます。

＞However, Japanese military system will be no use in coping with
　 war crisis,because it fully depends on and under hegemony of
　 the US Militaly command, and Japanese slave mentality can only work
　 as 'Kamikaze Sucide Attack Corps' just for the benefit of the
　 US interests.
（注：直後に本人が２つ目の“military”のスペルミス訂正）

“しかしながら日本の軍組織は有事の対処には役立たずであろう。何故なら
米軍司令部の覇権下にあり、それに完全に従属しているからである。そして
日本（軍組織）の奴隷根性は、アメリカの利益の為に「カミカゼ特攻隊」と
してだけ働く事が出来るのである”


たったこれだけ（笑） 　 それなのに論旨がムチャクチャで表記上のミスが
散見されます。既出の「自殺」は置くにしても、“command”はこの場合
「司令部」的意味合いで、“C”と大文字じゃないでしょうか？

おい、一番キモな箇所で初歩的ミスか（大笑）だから誰もアホらしくて
相手にせんかったんだよ。なにせ上の和訳は、好意的に解釈しまくった
ものだからね。

何より文頭のhoweverは、何に対する否定だ（笑）？？？


The Japanese armaments hold minimum self-defense for the menace from
the outside for a purpose not sake to invade other countries.
Therefore, it is totally impossible to seem to invade unrelated
other countries as a war-hound of the United States Armed Forces in
Vietnam War like South Korea. Your re”mark” is completely made in
a wrong premise. What in the world, you think, where does Japan
assume that do war with? North Korea？In geopolitical view, is it
a story after South Korea fell in less than a week…LOL? Even though
South Korean force is no matter how weak (just like you, Mark, yo,
shit we”a”k), will it hold until running out of the ammunition of
poor NK forces?

In the days of the Cold War, Japan functioned as a member of western
alliance, as a strategic point of the Far East area to suppress the
expansion of the Communism Camp. It contributed to not only the
profit of the own country, but also at the same time, the stability
of neighboring developing countries. Particularly for South Korea,
Japan played a role as the rear base of the Korean War, and after
the truce began, have been a keystone of deterrent as the
observatory base and the war potential accumulation place, against
NK forces and the Eastern support powers aiming to southing. For
example, the Korean Peninsula would be reunified under NK system
long ago like a Vietnamese case, and if there was not rear base
blocked by a natural barrier called the sea, and it was only
a bridgehead called South Vietnam.

The chicken race of the expansion of armaments by the U.S. and the
Soviet Union ended in victory of the former, but it was the great
waste that it bet the prestige of the country on. It was glorious,
and idiotical race. The participating countries of it, was U.S.A,
and the communist country, which did not pay interest to the
happiness of the nation.

In late years a burden of maintenance / the update of the weapon
bends over U.S.A. which is the only winner. In the military (and
economic) affairs side, U.S.A is already the dinosaur, which
evolved to an extremity.

It’s still in age of Pax Romana? Does the Spanish Armada dominate
the Seven Seas??
Hegemony is sure to shift someday in the future. It’s a historical
fact.

Therefore, each country must have military defense power, capacity
in the reasonable range that it thinks about. “Every man, woman
and child lives under a Nuclear Sword of Damocles”(hey, do you know
the source of quotation?), it’s logical to restrict for removing
offensive ability of the hostility power, unless it plans invasion
to other countries.