中国の反日デモ

日本の新聞（朝日除く）に宣伝も有効でしょう！
私も、下記にメールしてみました。
皆さんもどうぞ！

http://www.geocities.jp/baud_2005/tx310.html
http://www.geocities.jp/baud_2005/tx310.swf

英語と日本語で書かれいます。
●教科書実写＋英訳
●憲法９条の実在
●核兵器を持っていない事実
●中国への謝罪回数
●謝罪賠償(ODA)を中国民に知らせていない事実
●チベットを侵略している事実の隠蔽

------ -送る際の例文 ---------------- -
教科書問題のFLASH
http://www.geocities.jp/baud_2005/tx310.html

Subject: Introduction: China and Japan

The Chinese government has been rather hard on Japan for some time, but
especially in recent months. Many Japanese consider the Chinese government
at least an accessory after the fact in the student attacks on the Japanese
Consulate in Shanghai. It is plain to see that the Chinese police aren't
overzealous in putting a stop to the vandalism of Japanese property.

More generally, the Japanese are getting tired of the Chinese government's
selective use of history. The Chinese government is demanding yet another
apology from the Japanese government for the Rape of Nanking and other
acts of Japanese brutality in China before and during World War II.
At the same time, it treats any reference to the more recent, and continuing,
Chinese brutality in Tibet as contrary to the rules of international discourse.

Since Tibet has been incorporated into China, what goes on there is an
internal matter, and foreigners have no right to discuss it.
Many Japanese have lost patience with this one-sided spirit of criticism.
Following is a Japanese comment on the question of relative culpability,
Japanese and Chinese.

------ -送り先例 -------------------- -
国連人権委員会メール送信フォーム The Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
http://www.ohchr.org/english/contact/

Reporters Without Border （国境無き記者団）
http://www.rsf.org/contact_us.php3?id_mot=628
http://www.rsf.org/contact_us.php3?id_mot=629
http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=10192

▽Book Review
- Amazon "Rape of Nanking" Review
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0140277447/qid%3D1101479564/sr%3D2-1/ref% 3Dpd%5Fka%5Fb%5F2%5F1/103-8956146-4220657

▽新聞各社に意見メール
- LA Times - NY Times - Economist
- CNN http://edition.cnn.com/feedback/