対イラク武力行使

報告書を読めば、テロ対策が主な仕事であるＤＨＳの傘下に入ってから、人・金・物は足りず、そして組織としての指揮命令系統も上手く機能しなくなってしまった事が良く分かる。まあ、行間を読めないＺ２君には、感じる事が出来ないのだろうが…

Further, requirements associated with federal emergency preparedness grants
to states also support the perception that terrorism preparedness is separate
from natural disaster preparedness. A majority of grants to states emphasize
preparedness for terrorism and weapons of mass destruction and limit use of
the grants to terrorism-preparedness measures, such as the purchase of
specific personal protective equipment. ODP staff said that state grantees are
failing to take advantage of the grants’ flexibility and use them for all-hazards
preparedness measures. State emergency managers questioned grant packages
that required so much spending on potential events involving terrorism and
weapons of mass destruction, when they received far less funding to prepare
for natural disasters that are certain to recur. For example, the Gulf Coast
region experienced 91 major disaster and emergency declarations from
September 1, 1995, to September 1, 2005, all due to natural hazards such as
hurricanes and flooding. Yet a significant portion of the federal funding for
these states is earmarked for terrorism preparedness to the exclusion of natural
hazards preparedness.