対イラク武力行使

この方はどうしても自分らシオニストのやる"ちんちんちゅーちゅー儀式"を正当化したいようです.

この方 (モニターに正拳突きはしないでください）
http://biglizards.net/strawberryblog/archives/2006/06/post_2.html

ちんちんちゅーちゅー儀式
http://www.sexuallymutilatedchild.org/mohel.htm

ちなみにサンプルはKenya と Uganda ですか 　 （笑
In the Kenyan study, 1,391 circumcised men were compared to 1,393 who were not. And in Uganda, 2,474 circumcised men were compared to 2,522 men who were not. After tracking the men for two years, scientists found that circumcised men were 51 to 60 percent less likely to contract HIV than their uncircumcised counterparts. Since the studies were stopped, all the men have been offered the opportunity to be circumcised. And all the men were warned not to lapse into sexually risky behavior, such as abandoning condom use.
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20070223/D8NF543O3.html


ち
な
み
に

”もっと大きなサンプル”がありますよ。

HIV Infection Rate by Country

１）North America 　 （人口６−７割ちんちん改造してる） 　 0.76
http://www.overpopulation.com/faq/health/infectious_diseases/aids/north_america.html

２）Japan （ちんちん改造しない）0.01
http://www.overpopulation.com/faq/health/infectious_diseases/aids/asia.html

ちんぽこ改造するアメリカ人はしない日本人の７６倍の確率でHIVに感染してますね。（笑

ヨーロッパ（普通ちんちん） 　 ｖｓ 　 メリケン（まぬけちんちん）
Clearly, what needs to be explained is not a high female-to-male HIV transmission rate in Europe, but the high male-to-female rate in the US. Could the reason be the rougher action of dry, circumcised US penises, creating micro-tears on US women's vaginal walls? Perhaps not, perhaps it is is the different strains of HIV prevalent in the US and Europe, but this kind of difference between fact and interpretation illustrates that simple correlations do not necessarily translate into simple solutions.
http://www.circumstitions.com/HIV.html#hetero

もちろんあくまでもこれはcorelation(比例関係）があるだけであって causality（割礼は感染を促進する） を主張してるわけではありません。


おまけ

Korea 　 （９割ちんちん改造） 0.01
http://www.overpopulation.com/faq/health/infectious_diseases/aids/asia.html


Based on the studies published to date, recommending routine circumcision as a prophylactic measure to prevent HIV infection in Africa, or elsewhere, is scientifically unfounded.

What consistently appears throughout all of these studies is the strong correlation between genital ulcer disease and HIV infection. There is also a correlation between genital ulcer disease and the foreskin in many of the studies. However, when multivariate analysis was performed on several of the studies, the foreskin as a factor was no longer significant12,13, suggesting that the genital ulcer disease rather than the foreskin facilitated the transmission of HIV.
http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/HIV/vanhowe4/

When extrapolating globally, the hypothesis of this study could be proven to be wrong. The United States has a very high rate of circumcision coupled with the highest HIV infection rate in the developed world. Scandinavia on the other hand has one of the lowest rates of circumcision in the world coupled with a comparatively low inci