竹島

泣きが入ったと判断していいですか？
------------------------------------ -
インチキ国際法を振りかざして、国際法を論じてるふりはいい加減諦めたらどうですか。
領有権が問題になるのは、「現在の実効支配」だけが判断基準です。
歴史上の領有に国際法を持ち込むのは無意味です。
------------------------------------ -
・The Court therefore, primarily, analyses the effectivite's which date from the period before 1969, the year in which the Parties asserted conflicting claims to Ligitan and Sipadan.
・The Court further states that "at the time when these activities were carried out, neither Indonesia nor its predecessor, the Netherlands, ever expressed its disagreement or protest".
・The Court finally observes that it can only consider those acts as constituting a relevant display of authority which leave no doubt as to their specific reference to the islands in dispute as such. Regulations or administrative acts of a general nature can therefore be taken as effectivite's ・・・