韓国ふざけんな

WHOLE WORLD ADMIT KOREA'S VICTORY.

ONLY ITALIANS AND YOU ASSHOLE JAPS DON'T WANT TO ACCEPT IT.
(Thou I know Jap girls really really like to fuck Italian guys~)

WHY DON'T YOU SEE THE WORLD, HUH?

HERE IS AN EXAMPLES WRITTEN BY ENGLISH GUY.

FIND OUT MORE BUNCH OF OPINIONS WHICH ADMIT KOREAN VICTORY AND MOCK ITALIAN PLAYERS.

---------------------------------- -
Gregg Deinhart / Subject

"Accept The Defeat,Italy"

1. Totti`s call was not exactly examplary.
However, there was no PK for
Italy for sure.

2. The offside goal is a hogwash. Tommasi was called offside reasonably
long before he put the ball in the net. At that precise moment, the Koreans stopped playing him, and he continued to dribble and put the ball in the net. That is not a goal disallowed. That is a continuation of a dead play by the Italian.

3. There are some calls missed by the ref in that game -- against both sides -- which is not that surprising onsidering the physical nature of
the game. How about we rectify all the missed or borderline calls and contemplate how they might have changed the outcome? After all, it is possible and rather easily to argue that a foul 40 meters away from the goal could indeed have been converted into a goal. It is all subjective
conjecture and probability.

4. The Koreans had 8 shots on goal while the Italians 5. 12 and 11 shots respectively. That does not justify Trapattoni`s assertion that the Italians had more chances (as most Italians seem to believe). In fact,
Trapattoni argues that the Italians should have won because of the missed chances. I am pretty sure that the Koreans can argue the same thing based on the chances they have missed including the PK.

5. The Koreans got 27 fouls assessed to them while the Italians 23. The Koreans got 4 yellow cards shown to them while the Italians 5. The second yellow to Tottis was converted into a red; thereby, the Koreans
had an advantage on the yellow by one. That much advantage in calls for the Koreans as some Otalians claim?

6. It was the Italians who made the match very physical from the very beginning. It was the Italians who constantly argued when they did not get the calls that they thought they deserved, regardless of the correctness of the calls. The Koreans just got up and played when they did not get calls. That left an impression to Italians that the
Italians might be treated badly by the referee. But, I truly doubt that the calls were as partial.

All in all, I do sympathize with the Italians for the Totti call from which I think the ref should have walked away as rendering no call on either side. But, I do not sympathize with the Italians arguing that
they should have won based on
1) their subjective views regarding who played better that night,
2) contemplation on the continuation of a dead play,
3) non-sensical PK demand, and
4) how biased the calls were.
For the sake of their own dignity, Italians should accept the defeat.