さあ！諸君！捕鯨問題だ！

26頁へとびます。
項目名は 　 11.7.1 Revised Management Scheme。
この年の第５決議、’RESOLUTION ON THE REVISED MANAGEMENT SCHEME’
が採択された直後からの議事の進行です。

New Zealand introduced a Resolution (Appendix 6) on
behalf of Australia, Netherlands, UK and the USA
concerning the unreliability of past whaling data, which
was also adopted by consensus.
A Resolution on international trade in whale meat and
products sponsored by Argentina, Australia, Brazil, lndia,
Monaco, New Zealand and the USA was then considered.
Japan reminded the meeting of its reservations in CITES
and commented on operative paragraph 4. The USA noted
the discussion in the Infractions sub-committee on whale
meat from Taiwan, recalled the 1978 Resolutions on this
subject and non-member whaling, and considered that the
IWC must take an active role on the question. New
Zealand endorsed this approach and mentioned the
possibility of genetic testing of samples. Norway stated its
view that trade is not in the mandate of the IWC, a position
shared by Sweden and Denmark, the latter believing
CITES not IWC is the appropriate forum. Switzerland also
had doubts on the legal competence.
Denmark had instructions to request a vote on the
Resolution (Appendix 7), which was adopted by 14 votes
in favour, 6 against with 7 abstentions.

== =以上、IWC年報 REP. INT. WHAL. COMMN 45. 1995. 26−27頁

鯨肉貿易の規制強化案を提案したのはアルゼンチン、オーストラリア、
ブラジル、インド、メキシコ、ニュージーランド、米国の７カ国ですね。

日本代表が、自分のところはワシントン条約（CITES）で留保をしていると、
束縛からの自由を示唆してるのに対し、米国がすかさず、台湾からの輸入の
試みは非捕鯨国からの輸入禁止規定に違反していると釘を刺してます。