Re: バカを笑う Re: 正論を言おう
投稿者： ahoochina2000 投稿日時： 2006/08/27 21:42 投稿番号： [12590 / 29399]
香港の新聞
中国の反日は中国の戦略であることが中国でも認識されつつあるようだ。
あ、香港は中国とは別の国か？（爆）
題は、The China Syndrome
＞Jim Hoagland said China is engaged in the pursuit of tactical advantage, not historical truth, in pretending it possesses moral superiority over an unreconstructed Japan. It is the unfinished transformation of China, not Japan, which is the urgent moral and political question today in Asia. "It is China's military buildup not Japan's increased willingness to take on the burdens of global security, that is the destabilizing force in Asia. Americans and Europeans should not be taken in by Beijing's flim-flammery on the Yasukuni visit," he wrote.
George Will believed that the controversy about Yasukuni shouldn't mystify Americans. "With their comparatively minor but still acrimonious arguments about displays of Confederate flags, Americans know how contentious the politics of national memory can be, and they understand the problem of honoring war dead without necessarily honoring the cause for which they died," he said.
Will also pointed out a few things Beijing would never admit. Most Chinese resistance during the war was by Chiang Kai-shek's forces. "And Mao, to whom there is a sort of secular shrine in Beijing, killed millions more Chinese than even Japan's brutal occupiers."
Washington is correct in not interfering in the Yasukuni issue. As a senior administration official told reporters before Koizumi's sayonara summit with Bush, "I don't think it's the place of either leader to tell the other one what he can and cannot do domestically."
http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=5&art_id=25558&sid=9530174&con_type=1&d_str=20060822
中国の反日は中国の戦略であることが中国でも認識されつつあるようだ。
あ、香港は中国とは別の国か？（爆）
題は、The China Syndrome
＞Jim Hoagland said China is engaged in the pursuit of tactical advantage, not historical truth, in pretending it possesses moral superiority over an unreconstructed Japan. It is the unfinished transformation of China, not Japan, which is the urgent moral and political question today in Asia. "It is China's military buildup not Japan's increased willingness to take on the burdens of global security, that is the destabilizing force in Asia. Americans and Europeans should not be taken in by Beijing's flim-flammery on the Yasukuni visit," he wrote.
George Will believed that the controversy about Yasukuni shouldn't mystify Americans. "With their comparatively minor but still acrimonious arguments about displays of Confederate flags, Americans know how contentious the politics of national memory can be, and they understand the problem of honoring war dead without necessarily honoring the cause for which they died," he said.
Will also pointed out a few things Beijing would never admit. Most Chinese resistance during the war was by Chiang Kai-shek's forces. "And Mao, to whom there is a sort of secular shrine in Beijing, killed millions more Chinese than even Japan's brutal occupiers."
Washington is correct in not interfering in the Yasukuni issue. As a senior administration official told reporters before Koizumi's sayonara summit with Bush, "I don't think it's the place of either leader to tell the other one what he can and cannot do domestically."
http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?we_cat=5&art_id=25558&sid=9530174&con_type=1&d_str=20060822
これは メッセージ 12580 (syoumenkyousi さん)への返信です．