VANK認定の外国教科書の間違いの例 5①
投稿者： i_am_not_ill 投稿日時： 2010/08/07 19:30 投稿番号： [172696 / 230347]
「平均IQ75のネトウヨの糞」指摘の「外国の教科書の間違い」と比較せよ。
（失笑）
The Fallacy of a Japanese Outpost on the South Coast
Examples of Distortions
Japan: “The Yamato Administration, which ruled Japan, expanded its power to the southern region of Korea in about the 4th century in search of steel and the superior technology of the continent…”(Middle School Social Studies, History, Kyoiku Publishers, 1993)
US: The southern part of Korea is marked as part of an Imna Japanese outpost on a map. (Secondary School Social Studies, World Cultures, Prentice Hall, 1993)
Comment
The argument that ancient Japan ruled the southern region of Korea (the ancient Japanese military outpost, Mimana (369~562), is a story trumped up by the Japanese imperialists during the late 19th century while Japan legitimizing its occupation of Korea.
According to this story, ancient Silla and Baekje sent tribute to Japan’s Yamato Administration. Then, the Yamato Administration invaded the southeastern region of the Korean Peninsula in about 369 and established a Japanese military outpost in the Gaya region. The Yamato Administration is said to have colonized and ruled this area for about 200 years until 562. However, there are serious flaws in this interpretation of history.
First Korean scholars believe that the Nihon Seogi,(日本書紀), on which Japanese scholars base the Japanese outpost idea was authored by Baekje exiles or their descendants. Because of this, it is very possible that the author(s), who were exiled from a ruined kingdom (Baekje) embellished their story to favor Japan or to enhance the prestige of Japan’s rulers. Other evidence that the records in the Nihon Seogi are not true is found in the Kojiki, which was written eight years before the Nihon Seogi. The Kojiki does not contain any record of any Japanese military outpost in Korea.
Second, considering the power structure of East Asia, Japan was not capable of advancing onto the Korean Peninsula from the fourth to the sixth century. At that time, no unified nation existed in Japan. Furthermore, Japan did not have the shipbuilding skills to build ships to carry out a large-scale military operation overseas. In other words, China was the most powerful country followed by Korea. Japan was very weak at that time. Third, assuming, for argument sake, that a Japanese military outpost had indeed existed in Korea, it would then be natural to assume that ruins or artifacts remaining from that era would remain. For example, artifacts from Goguryeo’s King Gwanggaeto, were discovered in Gyeongju. Gyeongju was the capital of Silla, but Goguryeo had control over Silla at that time. Contrary to this, not a single artifact indicating Japan’s supposed presence in Korea has been found in the region even though Japan allegedly ruled the region for about 200 years. This is another piece of evidence suggesting that Japan’s allegation that it had colonized the southeastern part of Korea is false.
The Fallacy of a Japanese Outpost on the South Coast
Examples of Distortions
Japan: “The Yamato Administration, which ruled Japan, expanded its power to the southern region of Korea in about the 4th century in search of steel and the superior technology of the continent…”(Middle School Social Studies, History, Kyoiku Publishers, 1993)
US: The southern part of Korea is marked as part of an Imna Japanese outpost on a map. (Secondary School Social Studies, World Cultures, Prentice Hall, 1993)
Comment
The argument that ancient Japan ruled the southern region of Korea (the ancient Japanese military outpost, Mimana (369~562), is a story trumped up by the Japanese imperialists during the late 19th century while Japan legitimizing its occupation of Korea.
According to this story, ancient Silla and Baekje sent tribute to Japan’s Yamato Administration. Then, the Yamato Administration invaded the southeastern region of the Korean Peninsula in about 369 and established a Japanese military outpost in the Gaya region. The Yamato Administration is said to have colonized and ruled this area for about 200 years until 562. However, there are serious flaws in this interpretation of history.
First Korean scholars believe that the Nihon Seogi,(日本書紀), on which Japanese scholars base the Japanese outpost idea was authored by Baekje exiles or their descendants. Because of this, it is very possible that the author(s), who were exiled from a ruined kingdom (Baekje) embellished their story to favor Japan or to enhance the prestige of Japan’s rulers. Other evidence that the records in the Nihon Seogi are not true is found in the Kojiki, which was written eight years before the Nihon Seogi. The Kojiki does not contain any record of any Japanese military outpost in Korea.
Second, considering the power structure of East Asia, Japan was not capable of advancing onto the Korean Peninsula from the fourth to the sixth century. At that time, no unified nation existed in Japan. Furthermore, Japan did not have the shipbuilding skills to build ships to carry out a large-scale military operation overseas. In other words, China was the most powerful country followed by Korea. Japan was very weak at that time. Third, assuming, for argument sake, that a Japanese military outpost had indeed existed in Korea, it would then be natural to assume that ruins or artifacts remaining from that era would remain. For example, artifacts from Goguryeo’s King Gwanggaeto, were discovered in Gyeongju. Gyeongju was the capital of Silla, but Goguryeo had control over Silla at that time. Contrary to this, not a single artifact indicating Japan’s supposed presence in Korea has been found in the region even though Japan allegedly ruled the region for about 200 years. This is another piece of evidence suggesting that Japan’s allegation that it had colonized the southeastern part of Korea is false.
固定リンク：https://yarchive.emmanuelc.dix.asia/1143582/ffckdca4h4z9qa4n5doc0a4n9adbel_1/172696.html