対米全面テロ

言葉を選んでもう少し建設的な議論をしましょうの旨、一応言っときました。


Dear Mr/Ms Kil

I am wrighting this letter since I read your article about Japan's benefit
from the terorrism to WTC, and felt your malicious feeling against
Japanese policy or Japan itself.

I am one of the Japanese who is anxious about Japanese self defence
policy, which is trying to expand its sphere of activity without making
enough discussion in our country and atonement for the contries
suffered by Japanese military in WWII.

However, I dare to point out your inappropriate expression that will not
constructive for the future of our countries and will affect your dignity
as a journalist. While you are wrighting as "the atmosphrere seems
against Korea for discussing these Japanese activities ...", you are
intentionally showing your unpleasant feeling with contemptuous words
such as, 'a unexpected present', 'notorious as irresolute foreign policy',
'the world's cash dispenser' and so on. Actually these are true in some
sense, and can be said in a personal conversation or in a gossip paper.
But I believe JoongAng Ilbo is one of the best new medias, so I think
every article of your company is responsible to be enough persuasive
for all readers and, above all, must be constructive to improve the society
better. In this sense, your article sounds like just a grumble, and will
not produce any rational discussion. I expect you to point out precisely
the problems of Japanese foreign policy related to this terrorism, and
give a controversial issue that enlights us, the readers.