ケリー博士の遺言（１）
投稿者： stwmpxqmwts 投稿日時： 2003/09/30 16:49 投稿番号： [159897 / 177456]
イギリスのオブザーバー紙の８月３１日号に、問題のケリー博士の最後の論文が掲載されている。
これは説明によると、ケリー博士が自殺する数日前に書かれたもので、初めて公表されたものらしい。
事実上イラク問題に関する、遺言のようなものである。
ryuuyuuressiなどは
＞この追及の渦中で、犠牲にされたケリー博士、及び御家族のご無念に、胸が痛む。http://messages.yahoo.co.jp/bbs?.mm=NW&action=m&board=1143582&tid=bpjfa4lla5fa5m&sid=1143582&mid=159563
と白々しいことを言っていて、もしもそれが本当であれば辞書でも引いて、この論文を読むべきである。
もっとも、アルファベットもわからない中卒ryuuyuuressiの学力では、無理かもしれない。
ケリー博士の死をめぐっては、巷間でたらめなことばかり述べる人もいるので、
最低これぐらいは読んでから述べてほしいと思い、ここに全文をコピーする。
ケリー博士について論じたい人は、この論文の読了をノルマとしてほしい。
'Only regime change will avert the threat'
Here we reprint Dr David Kelly's article, written days before the Iraq war, in which he assessed the threat from Saddam
Sunday August 31, 2003
The Observer
In the past week, Iraq has begun destroying its stock of al-Samoud II missiles, missiles that have a range greater than the UN-mandated limit of 150 kilometres. This is presented to the international community as evidence of President Saddam Hussein's compliance with United Nations weapons inspectors.
But Iraq always gave up materials once it was in its interest to do so. Iraq has spent the past 30 years building up an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Although the current threat presented by Iraq militarily is modest, both in terms of conventional and unconventional weapons, it has never given up its intent to develop and stockpile such weapons for both military and terrorist use.
Today Iraq shows superficial co-operation with the inspectorates. Weapons such as 122mm rockets specific for chemical and biological use have been discovered and the destruction of proscribed missiles and associated engines, components and gyroscopes has begun.
Iraq has established two commissions to search for documents and weapons under the direction of Rashid Amer, a former head of Iraq's concealment activities, and a commission has started to recover weapons from Iraq's unilateral destruction sites. (These sites, dating back to 1991, were destroyed by Iraq, illegally, without UN supervision and as part of Iraq's concealment of programmes.) Amer al-Saadi - formerly responsible for conserving Iraq's WMD, now its principal spokesman on its weapons - continues to mislead the international community.
It is difficult to imagine co-operation being properly established unless credi ble Iraqi officials are put into place by a changed Saddam.
Yet some argue that inspections are working and that more time is required; that increasing the numbers of inspectors would enhance their effectiveness. Others argue that the process is inherently flawed and that disarmament by regime change is the only realistic way forward.
The UN has been attempting to disarm Iraq ever since 1991 and has failed to do so. It is an abject failure of diplomacy with the split between France, China and Russia on the one hand, and Britain and the United States on the other, creating a lack of 'permanent five' unity and resolve. More recently Germany, a temporary yet powerful member of the Security Council, has exacerbated the diplomatic split. The threat of credible military force has forced Saddam Hussein to admit, but not co-operate with, the UN inspectorate. So-called concessions - U2 overflights, the right to interview - were all routine between 1991 and 1998. After 12 unsuccessful years of UN supervision of disarmament, military force regrettably appears to be the only way of
これは説明によると、ケリー博士が自殺する数日前に書かれたもので、初めて公表されたものらしい。
事実上イラク問題に関する、遺言のようなものである。
ryuuyuuressiなどは
＞この追及の渦中で、犠牲にされたケリー博士、及び御家族のご無念に、胸が痛む。http://messages.yahoo.co.jp/bbs?.mm=NW&action=m&board=1143582&tid=bpjfa4lla5fa5m&sid=1143582&mid=159563
と白々しいことを言っていて、もしもそれが本当であれば辞書でも引いて、この論文を読むべきである。
もっとも、アルファベットもわからない中卒ryuuyuuressiの学力では、無理かもしれない。
ケリー博士の死をめぐっては、巷間でたらめなことばかり述べる人もいるので、
最低これぐらいは読んでから述べてほしいと思い、ここに全文をコピーする。
ケリー博士について論じたい人は、この論文の読了をノルマとしてほしい。
'Only regime change will avert the threat'
Here we reprint Dr David Kelly's article, written days before the Iraq war, in which he assessed the threat from Saddam
Sunday August 31, 2003
The Observer
In the past week, Iraq has begun destroying its stock of al-Samoud II missiles, missiles that have a range greater than the UN-mandated limit of 150 kilometres. This is presented to the international community as evidence of President Saddam Hussein's compliance with United Nations weapons inspectors.
But Iraq always gave up materials once it was in its interest to do so. Iraq has spent the past 30 years building up an arsenal of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Although the current threat presented by Iraq militarily is modest, both in terms of conventional and unconventional weapons, it has never given up its intent to develop and stockpile such weapons for both military and terrorist use.
Today Iraq shows superficial co-operation with the inspectorates. Weapons such as 122mm rockets specific for chemical and biological use have been discovered and the destruction of proscribed missiles and associated engines, components and gyroscopes has begun.
Iraq has established two commissions to search for documents and weapons under the direction of Rashid Amer, a former head of Iraq's concealment activities, and a commission has started to recover weapons from Iraq's unilateral destruction sites. (These sites, dating back to 1991, were destroyed by Iraq, illegally, without UN supervision and as part of Iraq's concealment of programmes.) Amer al-Saadi - formerly responsible for conserving Iraq's WMD, now its principal spokesman on its weapons - continues to mislead the international community.
It is difficult to imagine co-operation being properly established unless credi ble Iraqi officials are put into place by a changed Saddam.
Yet some argue that inspections are working and that more time is required; that increasing the numbers of inspectors would enhance their effectiveness. Others argue that the process is inherently flawed and that disarmament by regime change is the only realistic way forward.
The UN has been attempting to disarm Iraq ever since 1991 and has failed to do so. It is an abject failure of diplomacy with the split between France, China and Russia on the one hand, and Britain and the United States on the other, creating a lack of 'permanent five' unity and resolve. More recently Germany, a temporary yet powerful member of the Security Council, has exacerbated the diplomatic split. The threat of credible military force has forced Saddam Hussein to admit, but not co-operate with, the UN inspectorate. So-called concessions - U2 overflights, the right to interview - were all routine between 1991 and 1998. After 12 unsuccessful years of UN supervision of disarmament, military force regrettably appears to be the only way of
これは メッセージ 1 (messages_admin さん)への返信です．
固定リンク：https://yarchive.emmanuelc.dix.asia/1143582/bpjfa4lla5fa5m_1/159897.html