IAEAの虚構
投稿者： desert_leomontree 投稿日時： 2012/01/29 19:01 投稿番号： [5156 / 5582]
マンハッタン計画でも核開発は平和利用だと
アメリカ人にはプロパガンダされていたようだ
しかし、ウラン採掘で多くのネイティブアメリカカナダ人なども被曝し
犠牲になったようですね。
ウラン自体、オイル資源以上に限定的であり
原発を産業を拡大するのは不可能だとも言われていますが
日本でも原発を続ける裏には
核兵器保有の野望があるそうですが
某都知事は露骨に日本の核兵器保有を主張し
軍国主義復活を願っている人間が若い層を中心に増えてるのは
戦争の悲惨さを伝えないだけではなく
アメリカ迎合の腐敗した日本メディアやジャーナリストの責任も
あるだろう。
ＩＡＥＡの天野の態度を見れば
日本の指導者は、戦争中の右翼思想から脱却していないのが
明らかですね
まさに戦慄が走りますね！
＞＞Following reports of civilian massacres by Libyan aircraft the Security Council responded by approving resolution 1973 on 17 March 2011, although this time one-third of the fifteen members abstained. (The claims concerning civilian massacres were later refuted by Amnesty International, along with allegations that the Libyan regime had been employing foreign mercenaries.) This called for an immediate cease-fire and for all sides to seek a solution to the crisis while requiring them to protect civilians. Responding to a call from the Arab League it authorised the enforcement of a no-fly zone.
A US-drafted amendment allowed for “all necessary measures [to protect Libyan civilians] under threat of attack”. The American Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, promptly claimed that this allowed for arming the rebels under the terms of the resolution. Jose Cabral, the chair of the Sanctions Committee, disagreed and declared that “the resolution [1973] imposes a full embargo on arms.” The US and NATO however had no interest in legal formalities and large quantities of arms were subsequently supplied to the rebels from Qatar via the Egyptian border. France also in shipped some supplies direct, while NATO Special Forces supplied training and expertise
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28841
アメリカ人にはプロパガンダされていたようだ
しかし、ウラン採掘で多くのネイティブアメリカカナダ人なども被曝し
犠牲になったようですね。
ウラン自体、オイル資源以上に限定的であり
原発を産業を拡大するのは不可能だとも言われていますが
日本でも原発を続ける裏には
核兵器保有の野望があるそうですが
某都知事は露骨に日本の核兵器保有を主張し
軍国主義復活を願っている人間が若い層を中心に増えてるのは
戦争の悲惨さを伝えないだけではなく
アメリカ迎合の腐敗した日本メディアやジャーナリストの責任も
あるだろう。
ＩＡＥＡの天野の態度を見れば
日本の指導者は、戦争中の右翼思想から脱却していないのが
明らかですね
まさに戦慄が走りますね！
＞＞Following reports of civilian massacres by Libyan aircraft the Security Council responded by approving resolution 1973 on 17 March 2011, although this time one-third of the fifteen members abstained. (The claims concerning civilian massacres were later refuted by Amnesty International, along with allegations that the Libyan regime had been employing foreign mercenaries.) This called for an immediate cease-fire and for all sides to seek a solution to the crisis while requiring them to protect civilians. Responding to a call from the Arab League it authorised the enforcement of a no-fly zone.
A US-drafted amendment allowed for “all necessary measures [to protect Libyan civilians] under threat of attack”. The American Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, promptly claimed that this allowed for arming the rebels under the terms of the resolution. Jose Cabral, the chair of the Sanctions Committee, disagreed and declared that “the resolution [1973] imposes a full embargo on arms.” The US and NATO however had no interest in legal formalities and large quantities of arms were subsequently supplied to the rebels from Qatar via the Egyptian border. France also in shipped some supplies direct, while NATO Special Forces supplied training and expertise
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=28841