イスラエル建国のインチキさ！
投稿者： kowaiuyononakade2 投稿日時： 2011/12/15 19:45 投稿番号： [5043 / 5582]
１９４８年に国連でイスラエル建国の是非の投票が行なわれたが
アラブ諸国はすべて拒否し、参加さえしていない
しかも他にもイスラエルは明らかに侵略植民地軍事支配化であり
独立を認めていない国が存在するが
英国が賛成ではなく棄権している。
イスラエルが認められたのこそ
ホロコーストによるユダヤ人大虐殺が
政治的に利用されたが
しかし、一方的な情報で
ニュルンベルク裁判ではグアンタナモのような拷問で
無理やり告白を許容された人もいるようですね。
９・１１の首謀犯だとされているKSMも拷問による自白だそうですね
＞＞The decision of Harry Truman to vote in favor of the partition of Palestine was not easily reached. The State Department and several cabinet members disagreed. They deemed it more rational to stick with the wealthy Arabs who possessed the Middle Eastern oil than to side with the Jews. FDR, Truman's predecessor, had promised King Ibn Saud, a major tap to that oil, that the U.S. would not change its policy towards Palestine without prior consultation with Arabs and Jews. Alternate proposals were considered. A plan to permit immigration of 100,000 Jews and the creation of a federal state in Palestine, which Truman thought reasonable, was rejected by the Zionists. An informal lobby of Jews flooded the White House with demands for partition and was instrumental in Truman's ultimate decision. Harry, the underdog in the 1948 election, realized that to win reelection he would have to please that lobby!
WWI, WWII, the creation of a Jewish state, were all instances where Washington's warnings were ignored. What would have happened if the U.S. had heeded his advice? No one knows. But conditions in the Middle East couldn't be much worse and perhaps might be more promising for all than what exists today.
http://www.swans.com/library/art12/pgreen87.html
アラブ諸国はすべて拒否し、参加さえしていない
しかも他にもイスラエルは明らかに侵略植民地軍事支配化であり
独立を認めていない国が存在するが
英国が賛成ではなく棄権している。
イスラエルが認められたのこそ
ホロコーストによるユダヤ人大虐殺が
政治的に利用されたが
しかし、一方的な情報で
ニュルンベルク裁判ではグアンタナモのような拷問で
無理やり告白を許容された人もいるようですね。
９・１１の首謀犯だとされているKSMも拷問による自白だそうですね
＞＞The decision of Harry Truman to vote in favor of the partition of Palestine was not easily reached. The State Department and several cabinet members disagreed. They deemed it more rational to stick with the wealthy Arabs who possessed the Middle Eastern oil than to side with the Jews. FDR, Truman's predecessor, had promised King Ibn Saud, a major tap to that oil, that the U.S. would not change its policy towards Palestine without prior consultation with Arabs and Jews. Alternate proposals were considered. A plan to permit immigration of 100,000 Jews and the creation of a federal state in Palestine, which Truman thought reasonable, was rejected by the Zionists. An informal lobby of Jews flooded the White House with demands for partition and was instrumental in Truman's ultimate decision. Harry, the underdog in the 1948 election, realized that to win reelection he would have to please that lobby!
WWI, WWII, the creation of a Jewish state, were all instances where Washington's warnings were ignored. What would have happened if the U.S. had heeded his advice? No one knows. But conditions in the Middle East couldn't be much worse and perhaps might be more promising for all than what exists today.
http://www.swans.com/library/art12/pgreen87.html