イスラエル／パレスチナ和平

adventureoftheultraworldさん
お返事をいただけませんでした。…
あなたは、Netanyevを支持されますか。もしそうなら、それは、何故ですか。

http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/comment/0,10551,681673,00.html

Maladroit diplomacy played its part, but the failure at Camp David was the product of a deeper problem for which the Palestinians must also accept their share of blame. With the benefit of hindsight, the 1993 Oslo agreement that embodied the land-for-peace compromise was a mirage. Although both sides signed up to a two-state solution, neither was completely sincere in accepting its implications. The Palestinians clung to maximalist demands on refugee returns in the hope that demographics would allow them to rewrite the past. The Israelis insisted on territorial demands that made a mockery of the idea of a viable Palestinian state.
….
Tony Blair's call for the Saudi plan to be enshrined in a new UN resolution is a tacit acceptance that Camp David was a botched job. Progress will now depend on Colin Powell's willingness to spell that out to Sharon and Arafat this week.
クリントンのキャンプデ−ビッドの呪縛（spell）からSharonとArafatを解き放つ意思が
あるかどうかだ。
他方、Jerusalem Postは、Madrid会議（international peace conference）を 　 new
agendaとせよとのこと。
他方、
http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2002/04/10/Opinion/Editorial.46635.html
ユダヤ系（事情にくわしいUSでイスラエルの肩をもつ人々のロゴス）
近隣のアラブ国家が、パレスチナに何をしてきた…
Nobody noticed. Yet when Israel acts - in self-defense, after six consecutive days of suicide attacks, with a degree of restraint and openness not exactly common among "besiegers" - the world convulses. The sad irony here is that, were Israel a crueler state, the world might criticize it less.
しかし、JPには、知恵はないらしい。
SharonのPowell-Arafat会談についてのコメント記事は
http://www.jpost.com/Editions/2002/04/10/News/News.46644.html